“Potatoes. Boil, ‘em, mash ‘em, stick ‘em in a stew.”
“LMS for 2 words about you. :))”
“Nooooooooooooooo!”
“People are the worst. Grr.”
“Need Chinese food. And Juice Stop. #studying”
Those are just a few posts I gathered from Facebook and
Twitter that are examples of phatic communication. It’s a digital version of
small talk and a concept that really hit home for me.
In Small talk in the
Digital Age: Making Sense of Phatic Posts, the authors identified four
types of phatic posts from a study of trending topics on Twitter.
1.
Expressions like right, LOL, hmm… or smileys
imply approval or disapproval in a short way, similar to nodding your head or
rolling your eyes.
2.
Mundane posts that are designed to trigger a
conversation. It my seem pointless but the message might contain information
that would lead to others commenting on your post.
3.
Posts that both to make a public statement but
protect privacy at the same time. This is common with teenagers who want to
communicate with each other but hide any real information from their parents.
4.
Posts that “indicate online connected
presence”. These posts simply say, “I’m
here” and ask “Is anybody else out there?”
The concept certainly has ramifications for the world we do
in University Communications, especially with regard to recruiting students and
communicating with current students and young alumni. As a former reporter now
in public relations/marketing, I’ve lived with the mantra that “Content is
King”. But Vincent Miller suggests that for many people, connecting is king and
content is secondary.
Although providing compelling and relevant content will
continue to be important, we need to keep in mind the importance of constant
connection.
No comments:
Post a Comment