“Close Friends Share Salt Together?”
Friendship Under the Context of
Networked Media
Ziqian (Amber) Li & Beixi (Amy)
Lu
Option 2 – Multimedia Essay
The development of networked media has enlarged our social
networking venues, and thus adding new meanings to what means to us as
friendship.
In this multi-media essay, we are trying
to explore the meaning and value of friendship under the context of today’s
networked media, and further investigate how such media landscape has
altered people’s social behaviors.
After a considerable amount of literature review and artifacts analysis, we
argue that networked media has redefined the friendship, and significantly
shaped people’s social behaviors targeted to friends – people adjust their way of developing friendships and
interacting with friends.
The History of A Friendship
The Traditional Value of Friendship
“Close friends
share salt together” – Aristotle
Greek
philosophers believed that true friends are the ones that people share life with,
emphasizing that shared real-life experiences are the foundation of true friendship.
This is in accordance with the definition of
“a friend” given by American Heritage dictionary – “people you know, like and trust” through interpersonal
interactions. Prior to the mass emergence of social media technologies, people made
friends mainly thorough face-to-face encounters, which are the foundation of “shared
life.”
Aristotle and Plato
Social Media Redefining The Meaning and Value of Friendship
Making
connections rather than making friends
As networked
media enlarges the platform of interpersonal communication and enables real-time
interaction regardless of location and time differences, the prerequisite of
befriending –face-to-face encounters – has been devalued, and building friendship
now could be entirely virtual.
The definition
of Facebook friendship has always been vague, ranging from established close relationships to merely bing acquainted
(Boyd, 2006). Once accepted as a friend, the two users’ personal profiles as
well as their entire social networks will be exposed to each other, even their
friends’ friends. Over 90% of users on social networking sites believe that
such media help them stay in touch with or stay updated with activities of
longtime acquaintances, such as high school friends (Ellison, Steinfield, &
Lampe, 2007). According to Tufekci and Spence (2007), over 50% Facebook users
said having discovered something very important about friends from their social
media profiles.
Some website
builders promote their sites as a new channel for “making new friends”, in
terms of connecting with previously unacquainted people (Donath & boyd,
2004). Think about the “accounts” you have on social media websites, you will
realize what a massive network our cyber friendship reside in – Email (usually
more than two), Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, Google +, blog, Skype, text
messages, Instagram, iMessage, and more. Thus, through such impersonal media, we make
connections rather than making friends (Jay Bear, 2011). In a research by British
anthropologist Robin Dunbar, it is suggested that, based on the size of the
human brain that processes language and thoughts, one person can only maintain
relationships with up to 150 people in total (Dunbar, 1993). However, the
majority of social networking websites users have larger numbers of online
friends than 150. And Facebook even sets one’s friends capacity as 5,000. Apparently, Dunbar’s friend-limiting number doesn’t
work in the cyber world.
The episode You Have 0 Friends (Season 14 Episode 4) from South Park – a popular American animated sitcom, used crude
language and dark humor to satirize the pervasive usage of networking websites like
Facebook as well as social media user’s behaviors. In this episode, “hanging
out” with friends means visiting each others’ “farms” on Facebook; kids
consider having no Facebook friends as the most humiliating thing; parents feel
very proud if their kids have more Facebook friends, and announcing “relationship
status” is a sign for serious relationship.
South Park S14E04 You Have 0 Friends
*Please Note: Due to copyright protection, we couldn’t find a
complete video of this episode. The one we are showing here is ten minutes long
and is in black and white sketches, but it still demonstrates our point
comprehensively. For those who are interested in watching the full episode, we
recommend you watch it on Netflix or purchase from Amazon. We apologize for the
inconvenience.
The following
song called Maybe by pop singer Jay
Sean sings about how a man misses a girl desperately; and interacting via
social and mobile media is the major way for him to express his affection.
Although this song is about romantic relationship, we think it reflects the
change in people’s interpersonal behavior under the influence of networked
media.
Maybe by Jay
Sean
Beep, beep, oh
look, now there goes my phone
And once again I'm just hoping it's a text from you
It ain't right, I read your messages twice, thrice
Four times a night, it's true
Everyday I
patiently wait
Feeling like a
fool but I do anyway
Nothing can
feel as sweet and as real
As knowing I
wasn't waiting in vain
And maybe it's
true, I'm caught up on you
Maybe there's
a chance that you're stuck on me too
So maybe I'm
wrong, it's all in my head
Maybe we're afraid
of words, we both hadn't said
I'm always connected on-line, check Facebook all
the time
Hoping you've checked my profile
Just can't
help wondering why you play it cool
But see I'm
hopelessly falling for you
Every night on
my phone I flirt with you
And I know
that you like it, girl
All jokin'
aside, what say? You and I
Come out and
say what we're trying to hide
In addition, according
to “Social Compensation” model, introverts or people have difficulty in building
real-life social networks would rely on cyber relationships to socialize and
interact with others. They usually feel free and easy-to-talk while interacting
online (Kraut et al. 2002).
I Made A Friend
Last but not
least, social media added values to modern friendship and enlarged its scope in
a sense that it opened up a new channel for people to connect and “make
friends” with those within their professions or for career purposes.
Let’s look at
an example. In a blog posted by freelance digital marketing specialist Tamar
Weinberg (http://www.techipedia.com/2010/facebook-friendships/), she
provided several graphs to demonstrate how she built her connections via
Facebook and how her Facebook friends were categorized in terms of social
relationships. We can see that, in 2010, among her 1,508 Facebook connections,
37% (the highest percentage) are industry acquaintances. The second biggest
group is college connections, which accounts for 16% of her entire list. Only 5%
of all her connections belong to the “personal friends and family” group.
However, this
graph looks a little different in 2007, which is shown below.
We could see a
significant increase of the “industry connections” from 2007 to 2010, and a
decrease or event extinctions of “extracurricular programs”, “college”, “social
media”, etc.
Tamar’s Facebook friendship distribution might be
very similar to a lot of social media users, which further indicates that
people tend to maintain connections online with people at workplaces and within
their professions because the potential benefits or opportunities such
connections could bring in the long run. This is also in accordance with some previous
research findings which suggested that most social networks mainly support
already existing social relationships (Byod, 2006). In another word, people
engage in online networking activities primarily to maintain established
offline relationships or to enhance offline connections.
The Cruel Reality of Cyber Friendship
Social media consultant
Jay Baer pointed out some false perceptions people possess regarding online
networking and friendship on his blog.
The first
false perception is, more relationships produce more opportunity. People
continue to use social media to maintain offline relationships because it’s
easy, convenient, and beneficial. We always say that it is not about what you
know, it is about whom you know; thus we spend much time and energy to build friendship
online. However, Bear points out, when we really look into our friends list,
most of us would find a disturbing truth – “we hardly know anyone”. We couldn’t
really rely on cyber connections to introduce us to a new career or to get a
raise out from the online interactions. Thus people’s belief in the benefit of
keeping cyber connections is somewhat false, or at least doubtable.
A second false
perception is the feeling of intimacy and closeness conveyed though cyber
interaction. Here, we have
to bring up the South Park episode You Have 0 Friends again. This episode
vividly shows how absurd social media users’ behaviors could become if they are
addicted to online social networking. We see in the episode that having no
friends on Facebook means this person is unpopular or not sociable in real life
as well; parents even grandparents get mad if their kids refuse to befriend
them; girls get irritated if see other girls comment on their boyfriends’
posts; one might consider someone his “best friends” just because they have
been interacting actively online… some of the plots in the episode might be
exaggerating, but they do show the truth somehow.
Also, in the
iconic movie Social Network, Mark
Zuckerberg, as the founder of Facebook, has “500 million” Facebook friends,
while in real life he barely has a person to talk to. We highly recommend this
movie to all of our blog readers, because it doesn’t only show the audience how
Facebook was developed, it also explains why online social networking has
become a necessity of people’s lives.
People may
consider those who they follow on Twitter and once had a couple of interaction
with as friends, or those who are simply in their Facebook friend list as
friends, but such connection, more than often, does not produce any real meaningful
communication. In short, we just need to ponder whether it is worthwhile for us
spending much time and energy building large online networks of superficial
connections, at the expense of maintaining a few cherished reliable real-life friendships
Friendships
Count, Not Friends Count
We would also like
to conclude our essay with this TED Talk given by Kelly Page – Rediscovering
Friendship.
Kelly Page looked
at how the emergence social media has influenced people’s relationships with
others, especially friendship. By 2008, there were 8 million friend connections
on the Facebook. Technically people thought of their Facebook friends as
friends, but Kelly Page pointed that the friends connecting via Facebook are
just Facebook connections, not friendships.
She explained
her idea by arguing about the definition and her own perception of friendship.
She pointed out that friends are people that always love, support and be there
for each other. Friendship is about the behavior and action that people involve
that actually influence others. Most people update the status on Facebook
everyday, upload pictures, and chat with their Facebook friends. These are just
normal behaviors that could be open to everybody you know on Facebook,
according to Kelly. However, friendship is not a word, status updates, or
chatting over Internet, instead, it is about the meaning of interactions with
people, and the behaviors that enable the connectedness.
Therefore, social
technology is not able to change the friendship itself, but it does change the
way people connect with others. People should keep in mind that it is the
meaning of the interaction that matters, not the media.
References
Adams, D. (2011). The evolution of a social
media friendship. Retrieved from http://www.bitrebels.com/social/7-steps-the-evolution-of-a-social-media-friendship/
Baden, T. (2011, December). Social media and relationships: Who is actually a "friend?". Retrieved from http://socialmediatoday.com/marketmesuite/402767/social-media-and-relationships-who-actually-friend
Becker, C. (2010, October 6). Friendship in social media age. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_16260263
Houston, P. (2011). PHARMA AND SOCIAL MEDIA: TIME TO BECOME BETTER FRIENDS. Pharmaceutical Executive, 31(9), 68-72.
Jay Baer (2011, September). Social media, pretend friends, and the lie of false intimacy . Retrieved from http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-networks/social-media-pretend-friends-and-the-lie-of-false-intimacy/
Lawn, J. (2009, September). Networking, Social Media and One's Larger Circle of Friends. Food Management. p. 6.
Lee, J., Moore, D., Park, E., & Park, S. (2012). Who wants to be “friend-rich”? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the
Baden, T. (2011, December). Social media and relationships: Who is actually a "friend?". Retrieved from http://socialmediatoday.com/marketmesuite/402767/social-media-and-relationships-who-actually-friend
Becker, C. (2010, October 6). Friendship in social media age. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_16260263
Houston, P. (2011). PHARMA AND SOCIAL MEDIA: TIME TO BECOME BETTER FRIENDS. Pharmaceutical Executive, 31(9), 68-72.
Jay Baer (2011, September). Social media, pretend friends, and the lie of false intimacy . Retrieved from http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-networks/social-media-pretend-friends-and-the-lie-of-false-intimacy/
Lawn, J. (2009, September). Networking, Social Media and One's Larger Circle of Friends. Food Management. p. 6.
Lee, J., Moore, D., Park, E., & Park, S. (2012). Who wants to be “friend-rich”? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the
Tufekci, Z. (2011). Who acquires friends through social media and why? "rich get richer" versus "seek and ye shall find". Informally published manuscript, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from http://www.msuedtechsandbox.com/hybridphd/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Zeynep_2010_ICWSM_Social_Media_Friends.pdf
Weinberg, T. (2010, January 12). Want to friend me on facebook? please use my public page or linkedin instead. Retrieved from http://www.techipedia.com/2010/facebook-friendships/
Young, S. (2008). How To Make Friends. NZ Marketing Magazine, 27(7), 11.
No comments:
Post a Comment